Microsoft to spend Stac Wisdom off $120 Million
81 Stuart J. Johnston, Microsoft Settles to have Little bit of Stac, Computerworld, June 27, 1994, at 30 (Microsoft paid $39.9 million for 155’o of Stac, and an additional $43 million over 43 months for a license to Stac’s data compression technology); Doug Barney, Microsoft, Stac Resolve Disagreement; Microsoft Eventually Pays Upwards, InfoWorld, June 27, 1994, at 14.
83 As explained in Section V.C., infra, the superficially irrational behavior of undermining the application vendors that produce programs that run on Microsoft’s operating system is logical specifically given that Microsoft has an independent economic incentive to monopolize the s.
85 Amy Cortese, Business Week, Dec. 19, 1994, supra, at 35 (HP, Compaq and other big U.S. PC makers plan to bundle Windows 95 into their machines).
86 Come across Lawrence J. Microsoft: Not very Glorious, Bay Area Computer Currents, Dec. 1, 1994, at 98, 101 (Ex. 1); Carole Patton, Computerworld, Nov. 14, 1994, supra, at 57 (Ex. 8).
88 Don Clark, Microsoft to order Intuit In the Stock Treaty, Wall St. J., Oct. 14, 1994, at A3 (86% of retail store sales); Karen Epper, Software Bargain Shakes Upwards House Financial, Amer. Banker, Oct. 17, 1994, at 1, 25 (80-85%).
89 Michelle Flores, Asks for Additional info, Seattle Times, Nov. 22, 1994, at B11; Michael Schrage, Microsoft Renders Thousands; Does it Figure the treatment of They?, Washington Post, Oct. 21, 1994, at B3; Brent Schlender, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 36.
91 Brent Schendler, Fortune, Jan. 16, 1995, supra, at 4748; discover as well as, Michael I. Miller, PC Magazine, Jan. 24, 1995, supra, at 80 (Ex. 25) (“Microsoft could require just a small service charge on each transaction. Or it could make money on the float — the interest in the few seconds it takes to move money from one place to another. Or both.”).
92 For example, leading industry analyst Rick Sherlund of Goldman Sachs predicted that with the settlement, Microsoft “should dominate the market for desktop software for the next 10 years.” And another leading analyst, Richard Shaffer concluded that “It]he operating system wars are over — Microsoft is the winner . Microsoft is the Standard Oil of its day.” Andrew Schulman, Microsoft’s Traction Into App Tightened up By the Antitrust Offer, Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools, Oct. 1994, at 143 (Ex. 13).
93 See John M. Goodman, Brand new Dos Heavyweights Go Various other Round, InfoWorld, Aug. 29, 1994, at 87 (rating PC-DOS version 6.3 above MS-DOS version 6.22) and Earle Robinson, DOS-version Insanity? Consolidation Coping with Dos, Windows Sources, Oct. 1994, at 163 (“my choice would be the IBM . . . it’s cheaper”) and Yael Li-Ron, Desktop Dos 6.3: 2 and you can 2: Broke up Within Delivery, PC-Computing, bra computers ship with MS-DOS).
Probe from Microsoft was Lengthened – Fairness Dept
94 Don Clark Laurie Hays, Microsoft’s The Sale Strategies Draw Grievances, Wall St. J., Dec. 12, 1994, at B6 (Ex. 41).
96 All of these problems are discussed in Rory O’Connor, San Jose Mercury News, Nov. 13, 1994, supra, at 1A, 28A (Ex. 34).
Magid
99 Indeed, Microsoft’s operating system “lock-in” has permitted it to bring demonstrably inferior products to market (products that did not enjoy any appreciable consumer acceptance) without negative consequences to the company. See tsdates search Michael Morris, Microsoft Price: Deficiencies in, Far too late, S.F. Examiner, July 24, 1994, at C-5. (Ex. 33)
100 Joseph Farrell, Hunter K. Monroe and you may Garth Saloner, Brand new Straight Providers Out of Business and Options Competition Rather than Part Competition, October 1994 (operating paper).
101 Find, elizabeth.grams., supra, note 32. (Microsoft presently holds greater than 90% of the X86 operating system market share); Christopher O’Malley, Personal Computing, October 1986, supra, at 181, 183 (“Microsoft’s operating system” has “better than 95 percent” share of the X86 systems.)
